A Case of Idiopathic Orbital Inflammation Presenting as Isolated Myositis of the Inferior Oblique Muscle

Purpose@#To report a case of idiopathic orbital inflammation presenting with isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle. Case summary: A 54‐year‐old man presented with swelling on the left lower lid, pain on superonasal and inferonasal gaze, and binocular diplopia for 2 months. His head was tilted to the right by about 5° and mild conjunctival injection and 3 mm narrowing of palpebral fissure of the left eye compared to the other eye were observed. Eight prism diopter (PD) left hypertropia and 4 PD intermittent esotropia were noted on primary gaze, which worsened on leftward gaze, downward gaze, and left head tilt. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed enhanced hypertrophy of the left inferior oblique muscle. Systemic work‐up for possible inflammatory diseases yielded negative results. Therefore, a presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the left inferior oblique muscle was made. The patient was treated with 60 mg of oral corticosteroid per day for the first week, and the dose was tapered for 1 month as the symptoms reduced. Two months later, the patient became free from any symptoms and follow-up orbital MRI showed a significant decrease in size of the left inferior oblique muscle. There have been no signs of recurrence for 7 months. @*Conclusions@#A presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle was made in a patient with swelling of the left lower lid and binocular diplopia based on orbital MRI and systemic work‐up. Good results were achieved with oral corticosteroid therapy.

Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Failure

Purpose@#To report a case of secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for graft failure after primary DMEK.Case summary: A 47-year-old female underwent primary DMEK in her left eye with a diagnosis of Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. At 6 weeks later, corneal stromal edema with epithelial and subepithelial bullae was first observed. From that point on, the condition of the cornea and the visual acuity continued to degrade. After 7 months, a second DMEK procedure (i.e., a repeat DMEK) for graft failure was performed successfully without any complications. Since the second procedure, the cornea has been clear, and the best-corrected visual acuity has remained at 0.6 for 8 months. @*Conclusions@#To manage graft failure after primary DMEK, we performed a second DMEK procedure. The removal of the previous graft was easy, and there were no complications. Thus, repeat DMEK may be a feasible procedure.

Prediction of Effective Lens Position by Reference to the Preoperative Axial Length

Purpose@#We derived optimal formulae permitting effective lens position (ELP) for patients differing in terms of their preoperative axial lengths as revealed by partial coherence interferometry. @*Methods@#We included 736 eyes from 736 patients who underwent conventional cataract surgery at Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital. The preoperative axial length (AL), corneal power (CP), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured via partial coherence interferometry served as independent variables for ELP prediction. The 736 eyes were divided into seven groups differing by 1.0-mm intervals in terms of the preoperative axial length. We sought correlations between the independent variables and the ELP, and defined the combinations that best predicted the ELPs of the seven groups. @*Results@#The CP correlated significantly with the ELP for eyes with AL between 22.0 and 25.0 mm (all p < 0.01) and the ACD correlated significantly with the ELP for eyes with AL between 23.0 and 26.0 mm (all p < 0.01). Although a regression equation featuring all of the AL, ACD, and CP best predicted the ELP for the total of 736 eyes (p < 0.001), the optimal combination varied by the preoperative AL. @*Conclusions@#The effects of CP, ACD, and AL on ELP vary by the preoperative AL. The optimal combination of preoperative variables predicting ELP thus varies as that parameter changes.

A Case of Idiopathic Orbital Inflammation Presenting as Isolated Myositis of the Inferior Oblique Muscle

Purpose@#To report a case of idiopathic orbital inflammation presenting with isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle. Case summary: A 54‐year‐old man presented with swelling on the left lower lid, pain on superonasal and inferonasal gaze, and binocular diplopia for 2 months. His head was tilted to the right by about 5° and mild conjunctival injection and 3 mm narrowing of palpebral fissure of the left eye compared to the other eye were observed. Eight prism diopter (PD) left hypertropia and 4 PD intermittent esotropia were noted on primary gaze, which worsened on leftward gaze, downward gaze, and left head tilt. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed enhanced hypertrophy of the left inferior oblique muscle. Systemic work‐up for possible inflammatory diseases yielded negative results. Therefore, a presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the left inferior oblique muscle was made. The patient was treated with 60 mg of oral corticosteroid per day for the first week, and the dose was tapered for 1 month as the symptoms reduced. Two months later, the patient became free from any symptoms and follow-up orbital MRI showed a significant decrease in size of the left inferior oblique muscle. There have been no signs of recurrence for 7 months. @*Conclusions@#A presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle was made in a patient with swelling of the left lower lid and binocular diplopia based on orbital MRI and systemic work‐up. Good results were achieved with oral corticosteroid therapy.

Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Failure

Purpose@#To report a case of secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for graft failure after primary DMEK.Case summary: A 47-year-old female underwent primary DMEK in her left eye with a diagnosis of Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. At 6 weeks later, corneal stromal edema with epithelial and subepithelial bullae was first observed. From that point on, the condition of the cornea and the visual acuity continued to degrade. After 7 months, a second DMEK procedure (i.e., a repeat DMEK) for graft failure was performed successfully without any complications. Since the second procedure, the cornea has been clear, and the best-corrected visual acuity has remained at 0.6 for 8 months. @*Conclusions@#To manage graft failure after primary DMEK, we performed a second DMEK procedure. The removal of the previous graft was easy, and there were no complications. Thus, repeat DMEK may be a feasible procedure.

Prediction of Effective Lens Position by Reference to the Preoperative Axial Length

Purpose@#We derived optimal formulae permitting effective lens position (ELP) for patients differing in terms of their preoperative axial lengths as revealed by partial coherence interferometry. @*Methods@#We included 736 eyes from 736 patients who underwent conventional cataract surgery at Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital. The preoperative axial length (AL), corneal power (CP), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured via partial coherence interferometry served as independent variables for ELP prediction. The 736 eyes were divided into seven groups differing by 1.0-mm intervals in terms of the preoperative axial length. We sought correlations between the independent variables and the ELP, and defined the combinations that best predicted the ELPs of the seven groups. @*Results@#The CP correlated significantly with the ELP for eyes with AL between 22.0 and 25.0 mm (all p < 0.01) and the ACD correlated significantly with the ELP for eyes with AL between 23.0 and 26.0 mm (all p < 0.01). Although a regression equation featuring all of the AL, ACD, and CP best predicted the ELP for the total of 736 eyes (p < 0.001), the optimal combination varied by the preoperative AL. @*Conclusions@#The effects of CP, ACD, and AL on ELP vary by the preoperative AL. The optimal combination of preoperative variables predicting ELP thus varies as that parameter changes.